Outcome Orientation
In FSC, Outcome orientation means that normative requirements now will include a set of few key intended outcomes to be prioritized for reporting and monitoring progress toward.
Outcome Orientation at a glance
Traditional Monitoring and Evaluation activities are not adapted to demonstrate the contributions of FSC certification to broad sustainability goals at scale given the wide diversity of sustainability topics and forest contexts where FSC-certified forests are found across the globe. A way to overcome this challenge is to bring a stronger focus on intended outcomes and their monitoring as part of standard setting and the certification process. This will ensure robust and comprehensive evaluation of the impacts of FSC certification.
Implementation of Outcome orientation in FSC
Outcome orientation will be implemented at FSC through though two main revision processes:
FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship (FSC-STD-01-001) and The International Generic Indicators (FSC-STD-60-004).
For the PCI revision process, outcome orientation means the possibility to define and agree on the main intended outcomes of forest stewardship. This will provide the global template from where countries can select and prioritize a few intended outcomes to be reported and monitored progress towards.
For the PRO-60-006, outcome orientation means the possibility to select a few intended outcomes to be reported and monitored progress towards. This will allow countries to learn and improve standards over time considering what outcomes are more important for the local context.
The main difference in outcome orientation between the PCI and PRO-60-066 revision processes is that in the first, outcome orientation is more general, focusing on the main intended outcomes of forest stewardship globally, while the PRO-60-006 is where outcome orientation becomes more specific and concrete because is at country level that standards are developed and implemented.
More information can be found in the below documents and on the PCI Revision Hub.
Case Study
In 2025, we implemented the second phase of the Fast-tracking Biodiversity Assessment project. This phase focused on advancing the development of robust and standardized examples of monitoring requirements to test and explore how these could be developed and incorporated into the FSC standard-setting process, and implemented by stakeholders in Brazil, Finland, and Sweden.
See the StoryMap in full screen.
Outreach
Monitoring & Evaluation program has podcasts in several topics including Outcome orientation and eDNA, which can be found in the FSC’s podcast library.
Image
Episode 75: The Detail is in What We Measure: Making Impact Measurement a Reality
How we measure impact? How do we know that our system has the effect that we think it has on certified forests? FSC has committed to make its solutions more focused on verifying and delivering proof, which is called Outcome Orientation. This podcast is about the progress in Outcome Orientation.